How Channel Rates Google, Microsoft in the Cloud

Cloud applications

1 - How Channel Rates Google, Microsoft in the CloudHow Channel Rates Google, Microsoft in the Cloud

Google and Microsoft partners differ in some ways and are alike in others. A new survey finds Microsoft closing the gap on Google’s early lead in the channel.

2 - Google Partners Have a Profitable Head StartGoogle Partners Have a Profitable Head Start

Google Apps resellers reported that 50% of their 2014 revenues came from the sale of recurring cloud services and 13% from non-cloud services. Microsoft channel partners received 39% of 2014 revenues from recurring cloud services and 25% from non-cloud services.

3 - Microsoft Partners Catching UpMicrosoft Partners Catching Up

A full 90% of Microsoft partners report that they expect recurring cloud revenues to be higher than in 2014, compared with 73% of Google Apps channel partners.

4 - Sources of Profitable Application RevenueSources of Profitable Application Revenue

Deployment is reported as the most profitable, followed by business process consulting. Channel partners said custom deployments were the least profitable.

5 - Number of Vendor PartnersNumber of Vendor Partners

Google Apps partners typically work with fewer than five vendors. Microsoft partners typically work with six to 10 vendors.

6 - Partners Play the Vendor FieldPartners Play the Vendor Field

Almost two-thirds of survey respondents (63%) said they offer multiple vendors’ solutions in any given product category. In the Microsoft channel, 77% of respondents said they offer multiple vendors’ solutions in each category while 54% of Google’s channel partners do likewise.

7 - Bundling of Cloud ServicesBundling of Cloud Services

Demand for bundled cloud services might not be as widespread as some within the channel might speculate. Only 16% of respondents are always asked for bundles, with 19% of Microsoft partners reporting that customers always ask for bundles.

8 - Reasons to Drop a VendorReasons to Drop a Vendor

The top reasons for dropping a vendor are that the solution failed to deliver (54%) and the vendor failed to deliver on promises (51%). That the vendor altered profit margins came in third, at 41%.

9 - Top Areas of Channel InvestmentTop Areas of Channel Investment

Solution providers identified security, collaboration, CRM, and sales and marketing automation as top areas of additional investment.

Michael Vizard
Michael Vizard is a seasoned IT journalist, with nearly 30 years of experience writing and editing about enterprise IT issues. He is a contributor to publications including Programmableweb, IT Business Edge, CIOinsight, Channel Insider and UBM Tech. He formerly was editorial director for Ziff-Davis Enterprise, where he launched the company’s custom content division, and has also served as editor in chief for CRN and InfoWorld. He also has held editorial positions at PC Week, Computerworld and Digital Review.

RELATED ARTICLES

Must Read