Everywhere you turn these days, it seems server virtualization is all the
rage.
But from the perspective of the solution providers, server virtualization is
a double-edged sword. On the one hand, you might be able convince customers
that they need to upgrade to a new server as part of a server consolidation
project enabled by virtualization. On the other hand, customers may just as
likely deploy free virtualization software on their existing servers as part of
an effort to forestall upgrading altogether.
Given those issues, a lot of solution providers have tended to shy away from
virtualization. But upon further review, the real opportunity for solution
providers might be in storage virtualization.
Rated the No. 1
emerging technology for 2008 by readers of CIO Insight, a sister publication of Channel Insider, storage
virtualization almost always requires a customer to buy something. Better
still, it’s a technology that can be used across physical and virtual servers
simultaneously. About the only problem is that a lot of solution providers don’t
really understand it, so a fair amount of money gets left on the table when the
solution provider fails to bring up storage virtualization alongside server
virtualization.
There are multiple forms of storage virtualization that tend to add to some
of the confusion surrounding the topic. There are software-only approaches,
typified by companies such as DataCore
Software that sell software that can create a virtual pool of
storage across storage arrays from multiple vendors. There are also storage
arrays that include embedded
virtualization capabilities from companies such as Hewlett-Packard.
And then there are file
cluster servers from companies such as HP and Exanet that create more dynamic pools
of storage.
By and large, customers looking to simply increase storage utilization tend
to find software-only approaches the path of least-expensive resistance.
Customers that have greater performance concerns tend to like hardware
approaches, while customers that have massive scalability concerns coupled with
performance issues tend to favor file clusters. Of course, DataCore is quick to
point out that its software can also be deployed on a dedicated server to deal
with any performance issues, so it’s pretty much up to the solution provider
and the customer to decide what’s ultimately going to be the right way to go.
A good example of a solution provider that developed a storage
virtualization practice after becoming acquainted with server virtualization
software from VMware is J4 Systems, in Sacramento,
Calif. As a reseller of MSA
(Modular Smart Array) storage products from HP, J4 ran into some product
quality issues that led it to look for some alternatives. By adopting DataCore’s
software, J4 found that it could much more easily deploy new hardware offerings
alongside installed HP hardware products in a way that was transparent to the
customer. That development also helped J4 to launch a new disaster recovery
service based on the combined inherent capabilities of VMware and DataCore.
That model can be replicated pretty easily for just about any size company,
which ultimately means more services opportunities for the solution provider.
So the next time somebody starts talking to you about virtualization, don’t
forget to think first about storage.
Michael Vizard is strategic content expert for Ziff
Davis Enterprise. He can be reached at michael.vizard@ziffdavisenterprise.com.