SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

No Free Lunch: Microsoft Fumbles the Patent Ball

Microsoft’s decision to drop the other shoe on Office 2003’s XML schemas may come back to haunt it. News reports of patent filings with New Zealand and the European Union triggered fears that third-party vendors would be prevented from accessing Office documents without licensing the new formats. According to a reply from Mark Martin of […]

Written By
thumbnail Steve Gillmor
Steve Gillmor
Jan 30, 2004
Channel Insider content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

Microsoft’s decision to drop the other shoe on Office 2003’s XML schemas may come back to haunt it. News reports of patent filings with New Zealand and the European Union triggered fears that third-party vendors would be prevented from accessing Office documents without licensing the new formats.

According to a reply from Mark Martin of Microsoft’s PR firm to San Jose Mercury News columnist (and smarter younger brother) Dan Gillmor, “Microsoft filed for a patent in New Zealand (#525484) and that patent application covers a software innovation that relies in part on XML.”

And later, “The presence of this patent application in New Zealand does nothing to change the commitment Microsoft made this past November when it announced the [availability] of a royalty-free licensing program for our Office 2003 XML Reference Schemas.” A November 2003 press release dryly notes, “The initiative came about after fruitful discussions with the Danish Government.”

It’s no coincidence that Microsoft announced the “opening” of the Office Schema licenses at a time when the software giant is under pressure to settle the six-year antitrust probe by the European Union. And just as with its DRM licensing, just because it’s free now doesn’t mean it will continue to be down the road once market share reaches a dominant position.

But getting to 90 percent share or greater
—as Microsoft did with Windows, Office and Internet Explorer—will not be as easy this time. Oddly, Redmond seems blinded to the reality of the new Web operating system, where technologies such as RSS are pushing the marketplace toward small XML fragments called micro-content and away from bulky Word documents.

Part of the problem is of Microsoft’s own making. The company’s reluctance to cannibalize the Office file formats has slowed down Outlook’s move to an XML underpinning. For years now, Outlook’s XML object model has trailed other Office apps. Luckily for Redmond, office suite competitors such as Lotus and Novell imploded at the same time. Even now, Sun’s OpenOffice has cloned the Microsoft hairball rather than producing micro-content objects that could be stitched together to create the same kind of rich compound documents.

To read the full column, click here.

Recommended for you...

Caylent Research on Database Migrations: What to Know
Victoria Durgin
Aug 28, 2025
Exterro Debuts Agentic AI Tools for Data Risk and E-Discovery 
Jordan Smith
Aug 26, 2025
Multi-OEM Strategies & More Key to Infrastructure in AI Era
Victoria Durgin
Aug 26, 2025
Kendra Krause on New Role at ThreatDown & Channel Goals
Victoria Durgin
Aug 25, 2025
Channel Insider Logo

Channel Insider combines news and technology recommendations to keep channel partners, value-added resellers, IT solution providers, MSPs, and SaaS providers informed on the changing IT landscape. These resources provide product comparisons, in-depth analysis of vendors, and interviews with subject matter experts to provide vendors with critical information for their operations.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.