SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

Cisco’s Data Center Ambitions Stir the Pot

In an industry ripe with vendor rivalries, the latest battleground is notable for its many-against-one flavor. Alliances have been forming in what appears to be a mission with a singular goal: Anyone but Cisco. Clearly, Cisco’s breaking beyond its networking roots in a quest for dominance in the data center space has rattled more than […]

Written By
thumbnail Carolyn April
Carolyn April
Sep 3, 2009
Channel Insider content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

In an industry ripe with vendor rivalries, the latest battleground is notable for its many-against-one flavor. Alliances have been forming in what appears to be a mission with a singular goal: Anyone but Cisco.

Clearly, Cisco’s breaking beyond its networking roots in a quest for dominance in the data center space has rattled more than a few of the major server and infrastructure players from HP to Dell to IBM. The rhetoric alone from some of the latter company’s executives only proves that out. Many are looking at holes in their portfolios to fill and strategic alliances to form.

Dell is just the latest to strengthen ties to another vendor in a way that shores up its offerings against Cisco’s Unified Compute System initiative. The channel-come-lately vendor on Wednesday expanded its existing OEM relationship with Brocade to develop a Dell-branded virtualization solution that will help optimize and manage the data center. The alliance also involved integrated tool sets for managing the delivery of applications as services across the data center infrastructure.

Dell also is not the first vendor to look to Brocade technology to round out its data center capabilities. Earlier this month, storage player NetApp tightened its ties to Brocade, adding three new Brocade products – a switch, blade and converged network adapters – to what it resells on an OEM basis. Likewise, IBM upped its partnership with Brocade and NetApp, and inked an OEM deal with Juniper that adds a networking infrastructure component to Big Blue’s portfolio. IBM shed most of its networking business some years ago, but as data center convergence takes hold might be realizing it needs to play here more broadly. That message was clear when Cisco broke into IBM domain of blade and rackmount servers this year.

To be sure there’s competitive jockeying among all the major players with no formal gang forming against Cisco. But the shoring up of data center portfolios and the strengthening of strategic alliances went into high gear about the time the networking giant went public with plans to be more than just switches and routers.

The question I have is this: As the Tier 1s duke it out, are there Tier 2s and below vendors that might benefit as the alternative or best of breed, while also giving solution providers a more defined, simpler place to focus?

Recommended for you...

Dataminr and ThreatConnect Join Forces for $290M
Allison Francis
Oct 23, 2025
ShareGate Announces New Program and Advanced Assessments
Jordan Smith
Oct 21, 2025
Omega Systems Adds SASE to Security Service Portfolio
Jordan Smith
Oct 20, 2025
Nutanix Announces New Partner-Focused Platform
Jordan Smith
Oct 20, 2025
Channel Insider Logo

Channel Insider combines news and technology recommendations to keep channel partners, value-added resellers, IT solution providers, MSPs, and SaaS providers informed on the changing IT landscape. These resources provide product comparisons, in-depth analysis of vendors, and interviews with subject matter experts to provide vendors with critical information for their operations.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.