Linksys is forging ahead with its 802.11n initiative now, taking aim at small businesses. However, eWEEK Labs’ tests show that Linksys’ new products do little to resolve the obvious problems with current draft 11n implementations, while adding a host of underwhelming new features and spotty support for newer laptop computers.
Click here to read the full review of Linksys’ WAP4400N and WPC4400N.
Linksys is forging ahead with its 802.11n initiative now, taking aim at small businesses. However, eWeek Labs’ tests show that Linksys’ new products do little to resolve the obvious problems with current draft 11n implementations, while adding a host of underwhelming new features and spotty support for newer laptop computers.
Linksys’ new Wireless-N Access Point with Power over Ethernet (model WAP4400N) and Wireless-N Business Notebook Adapter (model WPC4400N) are the first products we’ve seen that offer the speed and range enhancements of 802.11n to small businesses. These products also pack a few other features that should help overwhelmed small-business IT administrators—including POE (power over Ethernet), wireless roaming support, and rogue detection and classification—although these capabilities often miss the mark.
The first 802.11n products show the standard’s promise. Click here to read more.
Available only through Linksys’ reseller channel (rather than on retail shelves), the WAP4400N access point costs $169; the WPC4400N is available for $119.
Both the new access point and client adapter use Marvell’s TopDog chip set (based on draft 1.0 of the 802.11n wireless specification). In contrast, the consumer-oriented draft-802.11n-based Linksys WRT300N and WPC300N we tested in the spring are based on chips from Broadcom.
During tests, the WPC4400N could connect to both Linksys’ Broadcom-based WRT300N and Belkin’s Atheros-based N1 Wireless Router at enhanced link rates. However, in both cases, the actual throughput lagged in our RF (radio frequency)-interference-laden San Francisco offices, posting sub-802.11g results.
Probing for Rogues
After we enabled the rogue-detecting Wireless Security Monitor feature on the WPC4400N, we had to create administrator or user accounts. The bulk of interaction with the Wireless Security Monitor then takes place from the Wireless Network Monitor application, which gets installed with the driver on client machines using the WAP4400N.
From Network Monitor, we could get an at-a-glance view of channel usage and detect nearby access points and clients. WAP4400N clients conduct the AP scan, periodically collecting and reporting all access points detected. Meanwhile, the WPC4400N reports the MAC (media access control) addresses of any clients that attempt to join the wireless network.
We could manually organize detected access points into groups of trusted or untrusted access points, or we could set up classification rules to automatically organize devices. For classification, we could create whitelists of trusted access point MAC addresses or SSIDs (service set identifiers), or even by manufacturer name or OID (object identifier).
To keep multiple administrators up-to-date with the latest classifications, we also could synchronize our settings with other Wireless Security Monitor devices on the network with just a click of a button.
Unfortunately, the rogue detection and classification methods the Linksys gear uses are fairly rudimentary because MAC addresses and network names are easily spoofed, allowing even slacker hackers to easily bypass the protections.
Is 802.11n gear worth the gamble? Click here to read more.
Also, there are no mechanisms in place to gauge a potential rogue’s true threat posture—Wireless Security Monitor does nothing to determine whether an untrusted device is in some way connected to a protected wired network, thereby presenting a true and real threat.
Compatibility is another shortcoming of Wireless Security Monitor—we had to connect to a WAP4400N wireless network with a WPC4400N adapter. If we connected via another access point with another brand of wireless client or via the wired network, we could not use the feature. Requiring a specific type of connection and a specific connector to the network looks an awful lot like a weak ploy to sell more client adapters—all for a feature that is pretty limited, as far as we’ve seen.
Dual-Core Denied
We could not get the WPC4400N Wireless-n Business Notebook Adapter (with driver Version 2.1.2.1) to work out of the box with our Lenovo ThinkPad T60 test system.
The adapter would successfully scan the airwaves to identify nearby wireless networks, but we could not successfully connect to any access points—neither the WAP4400N nor any third-party access points. This failure occurred when using both Linksys’ Wireless Network Monitor and Windows XP’s wireless configuration supplicant.
After successfully installing the WPC4400N on a Dell Latitude D610 (but without success on a Toshiba Tecra A8), we investigated whether the client driver has compatibility issues with Intel Core Duo-based laptops.
We discovered that we could get the WPC4400N working on a Core Duo-based laptop by setting the processor affinity on a pair of processes. Using SysInternals’ Process Explorer 10.2, we configured both the Linksys Wireless Monitor application and the WLS.exe process to use only CPU0.
Linksys and Marvell engineers are working together to create a new driver revision that will work with Core Duo laptops out of the box. Linksys officials claim this new revision should be available by the end of August.
Linksys also expects to start shipping in September a security router based on the Marvell draft 11n chip. The router will feature a stateful-inspection firewall, signature-based intrusion prevention (with a one-year signature subscription included) and IP Security VPN capabilities for remote users or site-to-site connectivity.
Next page: Evaluation Shortlist: Related Products.
Evaluation Shortlist
Belkin’s N1 Wireless Router
The prettiest of the draft 11n products we’ve seen, it also works pretty well (www.belkin.com)
Linksys’ Wireless-N Broadband Router (WRT300N)
Based on the Broadcom wireless chip set, this router has been Wi-Fi-certified—for those certifications that already exist (www.linksys.com)
Netgear’s RangeMax Next Wireless Routers
Netgear now has three products based on the 802.11n draft, and, at long last, they all work together—or so Netgear claims (www.netgear.com)
Technical Analyst Andrew Garcia can be reached at andrew_garcia@ziffdavis.com.
Check out eWEEK.com’s for the latest news, reviews and analysis on mobile and wireless computing.