The Fine Line of Managed Services

When it comes to managed services, it’s the worst of times and the best of times. The worst of times has to do with the state of the economy, but the best of times has everything to do with a fundamental shift in how customers want to pay for IT. Up until recent, customers had […]

Written By: Michael Vizard
Feb 26, 2009
Channel Insider content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

When it comes to managed services, it’s the worst of times and the best of times.

The worst of times has to do with the state of the economy, but the best of times has everything to do with a fundamental shift in how customers want to pay for IT.

Up until recent, customers had a capital budget bias towards IT. In fact, all too often about roughly half the capital budget was consumed by IT products. Obviously, as credit has become hard to come by, customers want to reserve what little access they have for credit for core investments. For example, a trucking company would rather use their capital budget to acquire new trucks rather than pay for new IT infrastructure.

This shift toward thinking about IT as an operating expense is good for solution providers that have migrated into managed services. The whole managed service model is to treat IT as an operating expense that allows customers to pay for things either as they grow or contract. That means that a customer does not have to make expensive capital investment bet when they not really sure how big their own business is going to be a year from now.

In fact, a recent survey conducted jointly by Channel Insider and Amazon Consulting found that vendors expect as much as 25 percent of their revenue to come from managed services in 2009. That’s good news in the sense that vendors are finally recognizing the value of managed services, but it’s also bad news in that it creates a recipe for conflict with the channel.

A lot of vendors are going to opt to either sell managed services directly or through partners that are essentially serving as agents of the vendor. That means that there will be a lot more solution providers in the market offering managed services, but not many of them will have invested in the network operations centers to run those services. This approach will clearly be popular in some quarters of the channel, but managed service providers that have invested in building their own NOC might have an issue with a vendor that suddenly starts offering managed services through hundreds of partners.

Truth be told, a lot of solution providers that have not invested in managed services will feel vindicated. They have long argued that as time evolved, they would not be able to justify the capital investment in a NOC when vendors would essentially be providing that service. Of course, the problem with that model is that the valuation of your business is going to be a lot less when all your business is really doing is acting as an agent selling a low-margin, undifferentiated service.

Ultimately, solution providers are going to have to rely on a blended approach to managed services. In some instances, it will be simpler to just resell a branded vendor service. But in other instances there is a clear opportunity to deliver higher value-added services tailored to the specific custom requirements of the customer. The challenge is going to be to try to figure out exactly where that fine line is going to be over any given three year window.

Mike Vizard is senior vice president of market strategies and content services at Ziff Davis Enterprise and a regular contributor to Channel Insider.

thumbnail Michael Vizard

Michael Vizard is a seasoned IT journalist, with nearly 30 years of experience writing and editing about enterprise IT issues. He is a writer for publications including Programmableweb, IT Business Edge, CIOinsight, Channel Insider and UBM Tech. He formerly was editorial director for Ziff-Davis Enterprise, where he launched the company’s custom content division, and has also served as editor in chief for CRN and InfoWorld. He also has held editorial positions at PC Week, Computerworld and Digital Review.

Recommended for you...

Video: Q2 2025 Channel Insights and Trends with the Channel Insider Editorial Team

A fast-paced editorial recap of Q2 2025 in the IT channel covering leadership shakeups at Kaseya, layoffs at Intel, federal obstacles pausing major acquisitions, AI adoption slowdowns, quantum security threats, evolving partner programs, and global economic tensions.

Katie Bavoso
Jul 17, 2025
XTIUM CEO and EMEA Leader on Global Business Opportunities

Global MSP XTIUM formally expands into EMEA with HQ in the Netherlands, unifying services for regional growth and global IT support.

Video: Inside MSP Owners Group: Juan Fernandez’s Vision for MSP 5.0, Rollups, and Employee Ownership

Juan Fernandez shares why he started the newly formed MSP Owners Group and what makes his rollup MSP different from others.

Katie Bavoso
Jul 2, 2025
Video: How Servix Solved Brado’s Remote Logistics IT Challenges with Scale Computing Edge Clusters

Discover how Servix and Brado tackled remote IT infrastructure challenges using Scale Computing edge solutions.

Katie Bavoso
Jul 1, 2025
Channel Insider Logo

Channel Insider combines news and technology recommendations to keep channel partners, value-added resellers, IT solution providers, MSPs, and SaaS providers informed on the changing IT landscape. These resources provide product comparisons, in-depth analysis of vendors, and interviews with subject matter experts to provide vendors with critical information for their operations.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.