How to Avoid Being Driven Mad by Managed Services

When it comes to anything related to information technology, it’s always the little things that ultimately kill you. And nothing can kill a managed service business faster than all the costs associated with tracking down some intermittent performance issue that cannot be easily replicated. Anybody running a managed service, or for that matter anybody in […]

Written By: Michael Vizard
Oct 6, 2008
Channel Insider content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

When it comes to anything related to information technology, it’s always the little things that ultimately kill you. And nothing can kill a managed service business faster than all the costs associated with tracking down some intermittent performance issue that cannot be easily replicated.

Anybody running a managed service, or for that matter anybody in IT, has seen their share of gremlins, otherwise known as those inexplicable issues that adversely affect the performance of an application. There’s always a rational explanation. But how much time it will take to ultimately determine the cause and then fix it is anybody’s guess.

Michael Corey, the CEO of a company called Ntirety, a provider of remote database administration services based in Dedham, Mass., dealt with these types of issues when his company first ventured into the managed services space.

It didn’t take long for Corey and his colleagues to figure out that they needed a structured approach to dealing with application and database performance issues. Otherwise, they would have spent all their time chasing gremlins at the expense of making a profit.

To deal with this issue, Ntirety turned to a vendor called Precise Software Solutions, which started out life as an independent company before being acquired by Veritas, which in turn was acquired by Symantec. Now Precise has been spun out of Symantec as an independent company again.

As managed service providers of all stripes look to move up the proverbial stack in search of higher margin products and technologies, they are increasingly going to encounter random performance gremlins. Each one of those gremlins won’t kill the business all by itself. But collectively, gremlins can exact a heavy toll on your IT service department, which in turns adds costs and saps productivity.

Worse yet, new technologies such as virtualization and latency-sensitive applications built using Web services technologies will add overhead and complexity to any service that is dependent on managing applications. That makes all the more critical for solution providers to have a structured approach to dealing with application performance issues.

After all, each customer has their own unique issues. But the odds are more than good that if a customer has one problem, chances are another one will encounter a similar issue. It doesn’t make sense to constantly reinvent the wheel for each customer when the intellectual capital needed to solve the problem could already be residing in an overall management framework.

When it comes to managed services, the name of the game is to provide the greatest amount of automated service at the least cost possible. But providing excellent customer service can also drive you to distraction because of the costs involved. So at the end of the day, the only way to having a fighting chance against being driven mad by thousands of gremlins eating away at the performance metrics is to create a system to monitor application performance that can quickly and easily identify and isolate issues across all the elements that make up the application. Anything short of that is going wind up being little more than a one way ticket to the IT funny farm.

 

 

thumbnail Michael Vizard

Michael Vizard is a seasoned IT journalist, with nearly 30 years of experience writing and editing about enterprise IT issues. He is a writer for publications including Programmableweb, IT Business Edge, CIOinsight, Channel Insider and UBM Tech. He formerly was editorial director for Ziff-Davis Enterprise, where he launched the company’s custom content division, and has also served as editor in chief for CRN and InfoWorld. He also has held editorial positions at PC Week, Computerworld and Digital Review.

Recommended for you...

Video: Q2 2025 Channel Insights and Trends with the Channel Insider Editorial Team

A fast-paced editorial recap of Q2 2025 in the IT channel covering leadership shakeups at Kaseya, layoffs at Intel, federal obstacles pausing major acquisitions, AI adoption slowdowns, quantum security threats, evolving partner programs, and global economic tensions.

Katie Bavoso
Jul 17, 2025
XTIUM CEO and EMEA Leader on Global Business Opportunities

Global MSP XTIUM formally expands into EMEA with HQ in the Netherlands, unifying services for regional growth and global IT support.

Video: Inside MSP Owners Group: Juan Fernandez’s Vision for MSP 5.0, Rollups, and Employee Ownership

Juan Fernandez shares why he started the newly formed MSP Owners Group and what makes his rollup MSP different from others.

Katie Bavoso
Jul 2, 2025
Video: How Servix Solved Brado’s Remote Logistics IT Challenges with Scale Computing Edge Clusters

Discover how Servix and Brado tackled remote IT infrastructure challenges using Scale Computing edge solutions.

Katie Bavoso
Jul 1, 2025
Channel Insider Logo

Channel Insider combines news and technology recommendations to keep channel partners, value-added resellers, IT solution providers, MSPs, and SaaS providers informed on the changing IT landscape. These resources provide product comparisons, in-depth analysis of vendors, and interviews with subject matter experts to provide vendors with critical information for their operations.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.