SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

SAP Agrees to Pay Oracle $120 Million

(Reuters) – Germany’s SAP AG has agreed to pay $120 million to Oracle Corp in return for a promise by the U.S. company not to seek punitive damages in its suit against SAP for software theft, according to sources familiar with the agreement. The legal drama in the case, which has captivated Silicon Valley, further […]

Nov 4, 2010
Channel Insider content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

(Reuters) – Germany’s SAP AG has agreed to pay $120 million to Oracle Corp in return for a promise by the U.S. company not to seek punitive damages in its suit against SAP for software theft, according to sources familiar with the agreement.

The legal drama in the case, which has captivated Silicon Valley, further heightened when Hewlett-Packard Co refused a subpoena for Leo Apotheker, its new chief executive and a former CEO of SAP, to testify in the case.

The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the judge in the case has ordered both sides to keep the matter quiet.

SAP, which reported profit just shy of $1 billion in its most recent quarter, has admitted fault in the three and one-half year case, accepted liability and shut down its TomorrowNow subsidiary, which improperly downloaded millions of files from Oracle’s customer service website.

The two companies are still fighting over the compensatory damages that SAP will have to pay, anywhere from tens of millions to billions of dollars. The trial began this week.

Compensatory damages are awarded for specific losses, while punitive damages punish a defendant for wrongdoing.

The agreement needs final approval by U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in Oakland, California, according to the sources.

Dechert partner Chris Scott Graham said $120 million is a big amount for legal fees, but he noted that a junior lawyer at a big firm working full time can bill $1 million a year.

"It’s an unfortunate truth about really big cases. They tend to add up really fast," said Graham, who is not involved in the case.

By taking punitive damages off the table, SAP could further narrow the range of evidence presented to the jury, Graham said. Regardless, Oracle might have been able to seek attorneys’ fees at the close of trial because SAP already admitted liability in the case, he said.

"Might as well make an offer up front and try to reduce the claims," he said.

Recommended for you...

Caylent Research on Database Migrations: What to Know
Victoria Durgin
Aug 28, 2025
Exterro Debuts Agentic AI Tools for Data Risk and E-Discovery 
Jordan Smith
Aug 26, 2025
Multi-OEM Strategies & More Key to Infrastructure in AI Era
Victoria Durgin
Aug 26, 2025
Kendra Krause on New Role at ThreatDown & Channel Goals
Victoria Durgin
Aug 25, 2025
Channel Insider Logo

Channel Insider combines news and technology recommendations to keep channel partners, value-added resellers, IT solution providers, MSPs, and SaaS providers informed on the changing IT landscape. These resources provide product comparisons, in-depth analysis of vendors, and interviews with subject matter experts to provide vendors with critical information for their operations.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.