Lessons for Utility ComputingBy Lloyd Switzer | Print
Re-Imagining Linux Platforms to Meet the Needs of Cloud Service Providers
Sometimes the best way to understand how to build a business is to see how the other guy did it.Sometimes the best way to understand how to build a business is to see how the other guy did it. The creators of the television industry studied radio. Many high-tech businesses were founded by handfuls of engineers who broke off from the company where they learned the ropes. The ailing utility computing business should learn from these examples.
Most utility computing pioneers are in dire straits. For instance, StorageNetworks, one of the highfliers of the Internet era, enjoyed a peak market value of $14 billion but today is being liquidated. Only utility computing providers such as IBM and Hewlett-Packard are hanging onand then only because of generous infusions of capital. The good news for utility computing is that a model exists: the power utility business.
Delivering the power is not enough; ease of use matters, too. The main selling point of electrical power is so understood that it's rarely articulated: Electrical power has many uses and is user-friendly. Computing power is similarly dynamic, but it's not as easy to access. Customization and implementation are so expensiveand such a drag on upgrades and maintenancethat the ease-of-use appeal so central to selling any utility becomes moot.
Users want the power, not the power plant. The pricing model for utility computing is based on selling the power and the system itself. If computing power is to be sold and consumed like electrical power, providers must remember that users want only the number-crunching power, not the resource-hungry hardware that generates it. Pricing must shift toward a traditional utility price plan, where billing is a function of how much power is used.