Survey Shows Linux Is the Better Server ChoiceBy Steven Vaughan-Nichols | Posted 2006-02-13 Email Print
WEBINAR: Event Date: Tues, December 5, 2017 at 1:00 p.m. ET/10:00 a.m. PT
How Real-World Numbers Make the Case for SSDs in the Data Center REGISTER >
Opinion: Get the real facts. Linux takes up less time to run and provision than Windows. (Linux-Watch)Put it in their copy of the Wall Street Journal. Place it between their doughnuts and coffee. Stick a copy in their organizer. Do whatever it takes to get your senior executives to read the new research report "Get the Truth on Linux Management," co-sponsored by the OSDL (Open Source Development Labs) and Linux management company Levanta.
After years of putting up with Microsoft's anti-Linux half-truths in its Get-the-FUD campaign, Linux supporters are finally striking back.
But if that's all this report was, I'd barely bother with it.
What's different about this report from Microsoft's endless series of anti-Linux reports is that it focuses on the hard evidence of uptime, management and software costs, and system administrator costs per server and user.
By those basic metrics, they (Microsoft) prove that Linux is simply easier and cheaper to manage on servers than Windows.
Actually, OSDL and Levanta don't need to prove anything. The numbers speak for themselves.
Read the full story on Linux-Watch: Get the Real Facts: Survey shows Linux is the better server choice
Check out eWEEK.com's for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.