So why all the changes at the world's largest IT distributor? The short answer is profit.
Ingram Micro's management says for the company to boost profitability and remain competitive in a world of airtight margins and reduced vendor incentives and rebates, it has to cut costs and increase productivity.
The company wants to be able to invest in new business areas, as it has done with forays into point-of-sale and digital home markets, and, more recently, with an ISV initiative. By investing in new business areas, the distributor gives its customers, mostly VARs and integrators, opportunities to expand into new markets and boost their own profits, according to Ingram Micro executives.
Without the consolidation and cost-cutting, the company's management believes its ability to make such investments will be inhibited.
For one thing, the margin pressure that keeps IT distributors constantly on their toes will not go away. Vendors, under their own pressures, will likely continue to get stingier on incentives and rebates for partners. And the 6 percent growth estimated for distributors in the foreseeable future, while not bad, is considered very modest in historic IT market terms.
"All these guys are under pressure," said longtime channel analyst Benny Lorenzo, general partner with Aspira Capital LLC in Fort Lee, N.J., and occasional columnist for The Channel Insider.
The only way to remain competitive in a tight-margin, slow-growth market, Lorenzo said, is to cut operating expenses, which is what Ingram Micro is doing.
Ingram Micro expects its various cost-cutting efforts will save about $10 million this year. By the first quarter of 2006, the company estimates its cost savings will have reached a rate at which it will save $25 million per year in operating expenses compared with the 12 months prior to the measures. The moves will cost the company $26 million ($18 million net of tax).
Tech Data Chairman and CEO Steve Raymund said his competitor's cost-cutting moves are designed to increase shareholder value and operating profit.
"Apparently the only way left for them to cut costs was outsourcing," said Raymund, who added Tech Data has no current plans to outsource. "We prefer to pursue automation first and outsourcing second."
Tech Data is doing some restructuring of its own. The company is spending $40 million to $50 million in its underperforming Europe, Middle East and Africa region with an eye to improving profitability. The company has embarked on an IT system upgrade and "harmonization" project, which, combined with the restructuring, is expected to save $55 million to $65 million.
Ingram Micro's outsourcing plan entails moving some job functions that require telephone contact with VARs, such as basic tech support and inquiries on e-commerce transactions, to the Philippines; it will move some backroom transactional jobs that don't require customer contact to India. The distributor is retaining Progeon, a subsidiary of outsourcing and consulting firm Infosys Technologies, to handle the offshoring.
Ingram Micro executives promise not to allow any degradation of service. Customers by and large have reacted positively, or, at worst, with a shrug.
But Ingram Micro customer Darren McBride, president of Sierra Computers, of Reno, Nev., has some misgivings.
"I personally think the changes are a mistake, but I seem to be in the minority," he said. "I am not confident they can implement these changes without impacting service. However, I think it will be six months to a year before we even begin to get a clue."
Raymund and some other channel insiders speculate that the overall positive VAR reaction may embolden Ingram Micro to eventually outsource more jobs.
"I think they'll expand it to Europe," Raymund said. "I'm not sure how far they'll go."
However, Brian Alexander, senior vice president at Raymond James & Associates, said he doesn't think further outsourcing will happen. Alexander added that customers have reacted positively to Ingram Micro's outsourcing plan because most of the functions affected are not customer-facing.
Customers, channel observers and Ingram Micro executives all agree on one thing: The company will have to execute well on the outsourcing and consolidation moves or customers will balk. Or, even worse for Ingram Micro, they'll go shop elsewhere.
To avoid the pitfalls experienced by other companies that have tried outsourcing, Ingram Micro is taking its time with the transition, which will take up to nine months. Parallel operations will run at Ingram Micro and the outsourcer before the distributor finally pulls the switch.
Channel observers and customers say they understand the distributor's need to manage its cost structure and seek higher profits.
And that means despite market challenges and profit margin pressures, at least Ingram Micro can count on the support of its customers. And that's not a bad thing if you're just taking over as CEO of the company.
"I feel good about where we are," Spierkel said shortly after Ingram Micro announced his promotion to CEO. "The company is in a good situation."