Intel - Channel Insider
Empowering the next generation Channel
 

Sponsored Links
  • Get up and running in as quickly as 30 days with BI. Learn how today.
  • FREE Securing Smartphones & Tablets for Dummies Book from Sophos
  • 5 New Technologies That Will Change Enterprise ITAdvertisement
  • Build an IT Infrastructure That Delivers the Future

  •  

    Intel Drops Hardware-Based 32-Bit Capabilties in Itanium

    in Intel



    Article Rating:starstarstarstarstar / 0
    Article Views: 2798

    Intel is removing the hardware circuitry in the next-generation Itanium 2 chip that lets users run 32-bit apps on the 64-bit processor.

    Rate This Article:
    Add This Article To:
    Intel Corp. is removing the hardware circuitry in the upcoming next-generation Itanium 2 chip that lets users run 32-bit applications on the 64-bit processor, leaving those duties to the chip maker's emulation software.

    The dual-core "Montecito" chip will be the first Itanium processor not to offer the hardware circuitry, said Intel spokesperson Erica Fields.

    The IA-32 Execution Layer, which was introduced into Itanium more than two years ago, has proven to be better performing and more flexible than the hardware-based feature.

    Intel, of Santa Clara, Calif., put the 32-bit capabilities into Itanium to help developers and users migrate their 32-bit applications to the 64-bit platform.

    While Itanium can run 32-bit applications, the performance is not at the same level as 64-bit applications.

    "After talking to a number of end users, we found that running 32-bit applications [on Itanium] was not a common usage model," she said.

    "With the advent of 64-bit Xeons, that was going to become an even less common usage model."

    Intel engineers decided to remove the 32-bit hardware circuitry to free up the silicon real estate for other technology, such as dual-core, HyperThreading and on-chip virtualization. Montecito will be the first Itanium processor to offer such features as dual cores and the Intel Virtualization Technology.

    Charles King, an analyst with Pund-IT Research Inc., said the move by Intel makes sense.

    "Most of those 32-bit capabilities were aimed, initially at least, at trying to get developers of 32-bit apps to get them ported to the [Itanium] platform," said King, in Hayward, Calif. "Any benefits they would've gotten from that have been done. There's not a lot more out there."

    In 1994, Intel and Hewlett-Packard Co. introduced what eventually would become the Itanium project, designed to become the processing platform that would replace not only the x86 architecture but also RISC technologies.

    However, the chip initially was hampered by poor performance and missed deadlines, and later hobbled by the rise of 64-bit capabilities in x86 processors, first introduced in 2003 in Advanced Micro Devices Inc.'s Opteron chip.

    Intel initially resisted the move, pushing ahead with Itanium and adding the IA-32 EL, but eventually brought 64-bit capabilities to its Xeon and Pentium chips in 2004.

    Those 64-bit x86 processors from both Intel and AMD, of Sunnyvale, Calif., have gained wide adoption, and Itanium's mission has since been shifted to one of targeting high-end workloads and RISC-replacement programs.

    HP, of Palo Alto, Calif., has been the key ally for Itanium.

    Read more here about HP's Itanium plans.

    It is in the process of standardizing its entire line of high-end systems on the chip, and in 2004 announced it was investing another $3 billion to help market Itanium.

    Other second-tier systems makers, including Silicon Graphics Inc., NEC Solutions America Inc. and Unisys Corp., have embraced Itanium as a way of gaining greater traction in the high-end computing space.

    They and other hardware makers last fall joined several software vendors, including Microsoft Corp. and SAP AG, in creating the Itanium Solutions Alliance, designed to crank up backing for the chip.

    The group this month released a catalog listing the various applications and other solutions available on the Itanium platform.

    However, most top-tier OEMs outside of HP have opted out of offering Itanium servers. The latest was Dell Inc., of Round Rock, Texas, which in September stopped selling its Itanium-based servers.

    Intel also announced in October that Montecito, which was scheduled for release in late 2005, would be delayed until the middle of this year due to quality issues.

    The delay comes at a time when high-end processor competitors, including IBM and Sun Microsystems Inc., are pushing out new products.

    Most recently, Sun, of Santa Clara, Calif., rolled out its UltraSPARC T1 chip, a processor with up to eight cores that also comes with features designed for greater energy efficiency.

    Check out eWEEK.com's for the latest news in desktop and notebook computing.




    comments dic


     
     
    >>> More Intel Articles          >>> More By Jeffrey Burt
     


     



    channel chatter


    HTML PLAIN TEXT

    Keep on top of news for VARs and Resellers with CI's Weekly Newsletter and Alerts.


    [ci] feeds
    XML
    Add Channel News, Product Reviews, Trends and Analysis to your RSS newsreader or My Yahoo!


     


    CHANNEL SPONSORED RESOURCE CENTER
     
     
     
    Start the New Year with business intelligence—it’s a smart move
    Join us on February 1 for an encore rebroadcast at either 5 am or 12 noon EST and discover how business intelligence (BI) supports companies in uncertain business and economic climates. Get expert advice on how to create a strategy that fits your organization's needs and budget and see how quickly it can pay for itself.
    Click Here
     
    Security and Availability Essentials for Running Your Business in the Cloud
    Are you moving to the cloud? Find out what every IT professional should know about security and availability before moving to the cloud. Hear what a security provider’s own CSO has to say.
    Watch Video
    A new algorithm automatically identifies relationships between variables to help reduce researcher prejudice.
    Click HereAdvertisement