In a global virtual press and analyst roundtable, Cisco CTO
Padmasree Warrior said blade servers being developed by Cisco for its Unified
Computing Systems are not intended to compete with existing servers offered by IBM,
Dell, Hewlett-Packard or Sun Microsystems. Rather, she says, the UCS strategy
is to put the assets in place to help the data center “evolve.”
“We’re not competing with the legacy server market, but looking at where the
data center has to evolve,” Warrior said.
Warrior isn’t wrong, but she’s not exactly being genuine, either. The key
word is “evolve,” and the current marketplace is definitely evolving. Vendors
are not only pushing into new technologies and markets, they are quickly
creating enemies out of old partners. Cisco is a perfect example of how this is
unfolding.
A data center built with virtualization as its backbone-enabling technology
will provide enterprises and midsize businesses with incredible new management
tools and utilization rates. A completely virtualized data center will reduce
costs by providing greater flexibility and speed in deploying new applications
and resources, and reduced costs in staffing and management. And, of course, a
virtualized data center will have higher degrees of integration with adjacent
systems—desktops to servers to storage—that will reduce physical footprint and
operating costs.
Ah, but all that is contingent upon the data center having virtualized and
integrated infrastructure, similar to the vision of Cisco’s Unified Computing
Systems. In other words, enterprises will have to either replace or augment
their existing infrastructure with the new Cisco gear, which will in effect
result in competition with legacy systems.
When Cisco unveiled its Unified Computing Systems strategy earlier this year,
it said the virtualized data center vision that hinged on a new class of blade
servers was aimed at high-end enterprise data center environments. Initially,
Cisco said it would provide UCS direct and then offer it indirectly through a
handful of large partners that had the capability and capacity to deliver the
complex system.
However, at the Cisco Partner Summit in Boston
last month, Cisco announced its intentions to launch a line of rack-mount
servers that would provide immediate opportunities for partners to sell
Cisco-branded servers. These C-Class servers, Cisco said, would be compatible
with the higher-end UCS blades when they become available. In other words,
Cisco is launching servers that will compete against entry- and mid-level
servers currently offered by Dell, IBM, HP
and others.
During the same virtual roundtable, Warrior and colleague Doug Dennerline,
senior vice president and general manager of collaboration software, also set
the limits of Cisco’s cloud strategy. They said that Cisco would provide some
software as a service, deliver platforms as a service (e.g., Webex) and support
the underlying infrastructure, but would not deliver infrastructure as a
service as Amazon, eBay and scores of hosting companies are doing.
It’s a nice sentiment, but the reality is that Cisco’s limits are not
exactly solid. Dennerline outlined plans for adding greater integration of
voice, e-mail and instant messaging to the Webex platform, which will
undoubtedly create more tension with current foes Microsoft and Citrix, as well
as draw new competitors, such as Skype and Google.
When asked about high-end, cloud-based enterprise applications such as CRM
and ERP, Dennerline said Cisco has no designs on those markets. Good news for
Salesforce.com, Oracle, Microsoft and Intuit. However, Dennerline wouldn’t draw
the line at not fielding productivity apps, such as Microsoft Office, Google
Apps or Zoho.
Cisco isn’t wrong for wanting a piece of adjacent markets. And, despite
Warrior’s assertions, Cisco has been quite honest and vocal about its intent to
explore any technology or market that hangs off its core products and has the
potential to be a billion-dollar business.
And Cisco isn’t alone; several other vendors are plunging into unfamiliar
markets that just a few years ago seemed entirely alien. ViewSonic—best known
for its displays and monitors—launched a personal computer. Dell continues to
venture away from its core and is reportedly developing a handheld computer
and/or smartphone. Hewlett-Packard is injecting more power behind its ProCurve
networking gear. Security vendor SonicWall recently dived into the wireless LAN
market. And the list goes on.
What worked yesterday for vendors isn’t necessarily going to work for them
tomorrow. Cisco, like other vendors at the top of their markets, must find new
markets and technologies to fuel their revenue and growth engines as core
products and markets saturate and commoditize. It’s not only reasonable for a
vendor to venture beyond its comfort zone, but an imperative in an increasing
competitive marketplace.
The lesson here is that limiting comments like Warrior’s should be taken
with a grain of salt. We are living in a dynamic, transformative era in which
today’s friendly partners could easily become competitors tomorrow.
Lawrence M. Walsh is vice president and group publisher of Channel Insider. Read
his research reports at [CI] Perspectives.
GET
CONNECTED WITH LARRY
>> Click Here to Follow Larry on Twitter
>> Click Here to be Larry's
Facebook Friend
>> Click Here to Link Up with Larry on Facebook
Commentary 
