Commentary - Channel Insider
Empowering the next generation Channel
 

Bull’s Eye Awards
Nominations Open for Channel Insider 2009 Bull’s Eye Awards
Nominations are now open for the Channel Insider 2009 Bull’s Eye Awards, which recognize excellence in customer service, technology prowess, business acumen, channel leadership, communications and community building, and innovation among vendors, solution providers, distributors and channel services companies.



Sponsored Links
  • Control VM Sprawl, What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You
  • FREE Sophos Encryption Tool: Encrypt, compress and share files easily
  • LSI 6Gb/s Portfolio Expands to Include SATA+SAS HBAs
  • Reduce the cost of managing your mobile workers.
  • Find out 7 Ways to Drive Data Center Efficiency
  • SonicWALL breaks through network and email gridlock
  • Save up to 40% on calling costs with Avaya Aura™



  •  

    Penny-Wise, Pound-Foolish

    in Commentary


    Article Rating:starstarstarstarstar / 0
    Article Views: 1113

    Rate This Article:
    Add This Article To:
    Opinion: Yes, using old software and hardware that still works makes a good deal of sense, but don't let that keep you or your customers from upgrading when it becomes truly necessary.

    I'm a big believer in, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." So it is that I have a 100-Mhz Pentium server still working in my office.

    I'll bet you a lot of your customers are the same way. I know integrators who are still supporting users running dBase, FoxPro and Clipper applications running on—brace yourself—MS-DOS.

    And you know, I don't have any problem with this. You've got an application that's vital to your business that runs only OS/2, fine. If I were your VAR, I'd love to sell you something newer—not to mention more profitable—but I'd also be willing to continue to service your older software and equipment.

    Unless, that is, your software or hardware is dangerously obsolete. That's an entirely different kettle of fish.

    Resource Library:

    Delta Air Lines' subsidiary Comair offers a recent example. Comair experienced a meltdown of its crew-scheduling software, SBS International's ancient program Track, during the Christmas holiday.

    Comair had to cancel more than a thousand flights—including some from my own hometown of Asheville, N.C.

    It was not a happy day at our local airport.

    You can't blame the software distributor for this one. The copy of Track that Comair was using was more than a decade old, according to reports. Can you say obsolete?

    The specific problem that nailed Comair's software was that it could handle only a bit more than 32,000 changes in a month. Once it went over that hard limit, caused by the use of a 16-bit integer, it was all over with. Days later, Comair was back in the air, but there are tens of thousands of flyers who will now think twice about flying Comair. I should know. I'm one of them.

    Let's look at another instance: Windows NT. No, there have not been any recent episodes of NT leaving a ship dead in the water, but NT is officially no longer being fully supported.

    Someday, and someday soon, there's going to be a major NT security problem, and Microsoft is not going to be there to bail you out.

    The moral of the story is a simple one: You need to get your customers to evaluate their technology.

    Yes, most of them don't want to do it. At all too many businesses, CIOs have become flunkies to the chief financial officer. And CFOs see IT as merely a cost center and not as the viable heart of their business.

    Heck, do you think Comair's executive staff ever thought of their software, and crew-scheduling software of all things, as being absolutely essential to their business? I doubt it.

    So it is that you need to look carefully at your customers' real IT needs. Are they using hard drives without proper backups that are well beyond their MTBF (Mean Time between Failures)? Are they using 8-bit or 16-bit software for jobs that have grown well beyond their original limits? Is there still a software vendor that stands behind their mainstay programs?

    If they are, and they're not willing to spend the money to upgrade their technology, you might want to consider waving good-bye to them. Sooner or later, they're going to have a complete failure, and I, for one, as the IT expert, don't want to get blamed for their penny-wise, pound-foolish approach to IT.

    eWEEK.com Senior Editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols has been using and writing about operating systems since the late '80s and thinks he may just have learned something about them along the way.

    Check out eWEEK.com's for the latest news, reviews and analysis about productivity and business solutions.



    Discuss Penny-Wise, Pound-Foolish
     
    >>> Be the FIRST to comment on this article!
     

     
     
    >>> More Commentary Articles          >>> More By Steven Vaughan-Nichols
     


     


    [ci] feeds
    XML
    Add Channel News, Product Reviews, Trends and Analysis to your RSS newsreader or My Yahoo!


    HTML PLAIN TEXT

    Keep on top of news for VARs and Resellers with CI's Weekly Newsletter and Alerts.

     


    CHANNEL RESOURCE CENTER
     
     
    Enterprise Mobility Zone
    The Enterprise Mobility Zone (EMZ) blog is a tool designed to help senior IT executives discuss, create and deploy next-generation mobile strategies in their organizations.
    Go beyond yesterday's tactical approach to mobility!
     
    Build A More Efficient Data Center
    Demands are growing but budgets are not. Solve your pressing IT issues using the resources you already have. Determine which technologies can help you drive efficiencies and how they are applied. Gain a quick ROI on new initiatives
    Find out how
    Let Enterprise TechBrief do the work for you. Aggregated content, tech news, product reviews, vendor updates, how-to’s—all you need to boost your efficiencies and cut costs, all from one place.
    enterprisetechbrief.com