Channel News and Analysis - Channel Insider

 


Convergence:
The Next
Security Wave
The convergence of physical and logical security isn't a new idea, but largely untapped by solution providers. Groups like 1nService and PSA Security are bringing these largely segmented channels together for this $7 billion market opportunity.

 

Why Klir Technologies Failed


Article Rating:starstarstarstarstar / 0

Rate This Article:
Add This Article To:
Opinion: Despite its innovations, the vendor ultimately was not able to adhere to traditional business principles to ensure its survival.

With little fanfare, Klir Technologies folded its tent and ceased operations at the end of July despite plenty of analyst and media accolades prior to its untimely demise.

It is worth taking a moment to consider why this highly regarded SAAS (software as a service) and managed services vendor succumbed in a market that appears to be growing quickly.

Capitalizing on the rapid growth of on-demand services business, Seattle-based Klir sought to address companies' IT performance management needs via a SAAS solution. Although Klir had been in business since 2000, it began to attract analyst and media attention in 2006 when it adopted some of the best practices of the Web 2.0 social networking world to address longstanding issues in the IT management arena.

Klir recognized that traditional NSM (network/system management) platforms from companies such as IBM and Hewlett-Packard had fallen short of meeting the needs of IT managers in the same way that the legacy, on-premise enterprise applications from software vendors such as SAP and Oracle have failed to satisfy the corporate needs of many business users.

Klir was in the vanguard of a new generation of SAAS vendors promising to deliver easier-to-deploy on-demand management solutions that would replace the overly complex and costly on-premise management platforms of the past.

A key ingredient of Klir's go-to-market strategy was giving away free, single-user licenses to IT managers to penetrate the market. This approach allowed IT managers to test Klir's capabilities without making a financial commitment.

This strategy followed the example of a similar tactic employed by a company in the 1990s, called VitalSigns, which was acquired by my former employer, INS (International Network Services).

Klir's vision went beyond simply giving away single user licenses in hopes of winning corporate customers. Klir hoped to gather valuable IT performance data from all its users that could serve as an industry benchmark that they could use to build industry best practice standards.

Klir's unique approach attracted more than just the usual analyst and trade press attention. By quickly building a base, or "community," of over 40,000 users, Klir also built an appealing target audience for many of the trade publications that have become increasingly starved for readers. As a result, Klir found itself in the envious position of entertaining various offers from publishers seeking to promote themselves on Klir's site. Typically, publishers would insist that a vendor like Klir advertise in their publications.

Klir's initial success also gained the attention of some major players in the market interested in adding Klir's functionality into their management platforms and harnessing Klir's community-building capabilities to expand their market penetration.

Despite all these attributes, Klir still failed to overcome three fundamental challenges that face most companies when "crossing the chasm."

First, Klir was unable to successfully convert the free, single-user license holders into paying customers. Second, its efforts to establish strategic partnering arrangements with the major vendors and resellers distracted it from the customer conversion process.

These distractions also prevented Klir from clearly distinguishing its SAAS capabilities on a functional level from a widening array of on-demand and traditional on-premise management alternatives.

Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema's popular business management book, "Discipline of Market Leaders," advocated that successful companies can only succeed in one of the following three strategic areas:

- Operational Excellence

- Product Leadership

- Customer Intimacy

Klir Technologies was unable to build a track record of success in any of these three areas. Its demise illustrates that despite the intoxicating appeal of today's SAAS and Web 2.0 movements, the market leaders of the future must still adhere to many of the proven business principles of the past.

Jeff Kaplan is the managing director of THINKstrategies (www.thinkstrategies.com), a Wellesley, Mass.-based strategic consulting services firm, and the founder of the Managed Services Showplace (www.msp-showplace.com) and Software-as-a-Service Showplace (www.saas-showplace.com). He can be reached at jkaplan@thinkstrategies.com.



Discuss Why Klir Technologies Failed
 
>>> Be the FIRST to comment on this article!
 

 
 
>>> More Channel News and Analysis Articles          >>> More By Jeff Kaplan
 


 
CHANNEL DEEP DIVES
CareersLinux and Unix
Computer NetworkingPrinters
SecuritySMB Partner
StorageSurveys
Solution BuilderMessaging/Collaboration
Dell ResellersMicrosoft Partners

 

 

SIGN UP FOR CHANNEL INSIDER NEWSLETTERS
Reliable, timely information on the business of technology. Sign up now.

RSS SUBSCRIPTIONS
XML
Add Channel News, Product Reviews, Trends and Analysis to your RSS newsreader or My Yahoo!

 

CHANNEL RESOURCE CENTER
HP StorageWorks Scalable NAS is highly available, scalable network-attached storage for any industry solution. To learn how you can take full advantage of fault-tolerant NAS that seamlessly scales capacity and performance, visit: http://www.hp.com/go/scalablenas


Feature Video: What Can Green Do For You?
There are many ways that systems can be run faster or more efficiently, using less energy and thereby reducing costs. Watch now!
Microsoft-hosted solution offers you advanced customer relationship management capabilities without a major investment in IT and staffing.
Try It for free for 30 days!